Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

.github/workflows/codex-autofix-review-comments.yml (1)

17-20: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Unresolved merge conflict markers left in committed YAML — workflow is broken.

Literal <<<<<<< HEAD / ======= / >>>>>>> origin/main markers remain in the concurrency group (Lines 17-20) and inside the embedded script (Lines 86-98, 100-112). actionlint and YAMLlint both report could not find expected ':' at Line 17-18, confirming the workflow YAML cannot even be parsed. This is precisely the merge-conflict issue the PR was intended to fix, per the PR objectives and the repeated "resolve the merge conflicts" requests in the comments.

Pick one side (or manually reconcile both) for each conflict block and remove the markers entirely before merge.

Example fix for the concurrency group conflict

-<<<<<<< HEAD
-  group: codex-autoresolve-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.event.review.id || github.event.comment.id }}
-=======
-  group: codex-autoresolve-${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
->>>>>>> origin/main
+  group: codex-autoresolve-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.event.issue.number }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.event.review.id || github.event.comment.id }}

Also applies to: 86-98, 100-112

🧰 Tools

🪛 actionlint (1.7.12)

[error] 17-17: could not parse as YAML: could not find expected ':'

(syntax-check)

🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 18-18: syntax error: could not find expected ':'

(syntax)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/workflows/codex-autofix-review-comments.yml around lines 17 - 20,
The workflow YAML still contains unresolved merge conflict markers, which breaks
parsing. Remove all conflict markers from the concurrency group and embedded
script blocks, then reconcile the HEAD vs origin/main content by choosing the
correct values in the workflow file. Verify the affected sections around the
concurrency group and the script content are valid YAML/shell with no remaining
<<<<<<<, =======, or >>>>>>> markers.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

AGENTS.md (1)

389-402: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major

Remove the unresolved merge conflict here.

The section currently contains two incompatible auto-resolve policies, so the instructions are ambiguous until this is collapsed to one canonical rule set.

🧰 Tools

🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~390-~390: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ly by default. This repository includes `.github/workflows/codex-autofix-review-comments...

(GITHUB)

---

[uncategorized] ~396-~396: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...ly by default. This repository includes `.github/workflows/codex-autofix-review-comments...

(GITHUB)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@AGENTS.md` around lines 389 - 402, Resolve the merge conflict in AGENTS.md by
collapsing the duplicated Codex autofix workflow guidance into one canonical
policy set. Keep only one version of the instructions for
codex-autofix-review-comments, making the trigger scope, excluded event types,
skip conditions, and resolve-task behavior consistent and unambiguous, and
remove the conflict markers and the discarded branch text.

docs/branch-cleanup-guide.md (1)

49-56: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Inspect the target file around the referenced lines with line numbers.
sed -n '1,140p' docs/branch-cleanup-guide.md | cat -n

Repository: BigSimmo/Database

Length of output: 4321

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Show the exact line range and surrounding context for the ledger lookup snippet.
nl -ba docs/branch-cleanup-guide.md | sed -n '35,75p'

Repository: BigSimmo/Database

Length of output: 195

---

Resolve the merge conflict and keep the escaped branch token.

The snippet still contains conflict markers. Keep $escapedBranch = [regex]::Escape($branch) so branch names with regex metacharacters don’t match the wrong ledger row.

🧰 Tools

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)

[warning] 49-49: Heading style
Expected: atx; Actual: setext

(MD003, heading-style)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/branch-cleanup-guide.md` around lines 49 - 56, Resolve the merge
conflict in the branch-cleanup snippet and keep the escaped branch handling.
Update the docs/branch-cleanup-guide.md example so it uses $escapedBranch =
[regex]::Escape($branch) and the Select-String pattern references $escapedBranch
instead of $branch, removing all conflict markers. Make sure the branch lookup
logic in the branch cleanup guide remains anchored on the escaped token so the
ledger row match is safe for regex metacharacters.

docs/branch-review-ledger.md (1)

21-32: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major

Resolve the ledger conflict before relying on it for throttling.

The review-records table is still split across two versions, so the lookup procedure no longer has one canonical history source. Collapse this to a single table before using it to suppress repeat reviews.

🧰 Tools

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.22.1)

[warning] 22-22: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

---

[warning] 25-25: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: no_leading_or_trailing; Missing leading pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)

---

[warning] 25-25: Table pipe style
Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: no_leading_or_trailing; Missing trailing pipe

(MD055, table-pipe-style)

---

[warning] 25-25: Table column count
Expected: 6; Actual: 1; Too few cells, row will be missing data

(MD056, table-column-count)

---

[warning] 31-31: Tables should be surrounded by blank lines

(MD058, blanks-around-tables)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/branch-review-ledger.md` around lines 21 - 32, The branch review ledger
still contains an unresolved merge conflict, so it is not a single canonical
source for review history. Resolve the conflict in the review-records table by
removing the conflict markers and keeping one consolidated set of rows in
docs/branch-review-ledger.md, preserving the existing entry for example/branch
and the added claude/llm-pipeline-review records so the lookup flow can rely on
one clean history table.

docs/rag-hybrid-findings-and-todo.md (1)

316-323: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟠 Major

Finish resolving item 22.

The post-write evaluation note is still split across conflict markers, so the registry-embedding result is ambiguously documented. Collapse this to one final sentence before treating the record as complete.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@docs/rag-hybrid-findings-and-todo.md` around lines 316 - 323, Resolve the
remaining merge conflict in the post-write evaluation note by choosing one final
wording and removing the HEAD/origin/main conflict markers from the findings
document. Update the sentence in the registry-embedding result section so it
reads as a single, unambiguous post-write evaluation summary, using the existing
evaluation wording around document_recall_at_5, content_recall_at_5,
top_k_hit_rate, force_embedding_failure_count, and failed_cases.

scripts/embed-registry-records.ts (2)

120-123: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Unresolved merge conflict markers.

Lines 120-123 still contain <<<<<<< HEAD / ======= / >>>>>>> origin/main. This is invalid TypeScript and won't parse (Biome/tsc will fail). Keep the /** Ensure owner count. */ doc comment and delete the conflict markers.

🐛 Proposed fix

-<<<<<<< HEAD
-=======
 /** Ensure owner count. */
->>>>>>> origin/main

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

/** Ensure owner count. */

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 120-123: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD

/** Ensure owner count. */

origin/main'.

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@scripts/embed-registry-records.ts` around lines 120 - 123, Resolve the merge
conflict in embed-registry-records.ts by removing the leftover conflict markers
(`<<<<<<< HEAD`, `=======`, `>>>>>>> origin/main`) so the file parses again, and
keep the `/** Ensure owner count. */` doc comment in the surrounding code near
the affected block.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

---

235-238: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Unresolved merge conflict markers.

Same issue at lines 235-238: keep the /** Main. */ comment and remove the conflict markers.

🐛 Proposed fix

-<<<<<<< HEAD
-=======
 /** Main. */
->>>>>>> origin/main

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

/** Main. */

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 235-239: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD

/** Main. */

origin/main
async'.

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@scripts/embed-registry-records.ts` around lines 235 - 238, Unresolved merge
conflict markers are still present around the script entry point; clean up the
conflict in the area containing the Main comment by removing the conflict
markers and keeping the /** Main. */ documentation. Verify the surrounding
top-level section in embed-registry-records.ts is left as valid TypeScript with
no leftover HEAD/origin/main markers.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

src/lib/rag-extractive-answer.ts (1)

323-333: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Confirm expected evidence-gating behavior in the tests
rg -nP -C3 '(red range|amber range|withhold action|hasWithholdActionEvidence|red_result_action)' tests/

Repository: BigSimmo/Database

Length of output: 10008

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Show the function and its consumers around the reported lines
sed -n '300,360p' src/lib/rag-extractive-answer.ts
printf '\n---\n'
sed -n '610,660p' src/lib/rag-extractive-answer.ts

# Find direct references to hasWithholdActionEvidence and red/amber range gating
rg -n -C 2 'hasWithholdActionEvidence|red_result_action|red range|amber range|\\bhold\\b|\\bheld\\b|\\bwithhold\\b|\\bwithheld\\b|\\bwithholding\\b' src tests

Repository: BigSimmo/Database

Length of output: 24199

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Look for red_result_action fixtures and any evidence that "hold/held" is part of the expected gate vocabulary
rg -n -C 3 '\b(red_result_action|withhold|hold|held|red range|amber range)\b' src/lib tests | sed -n '1,260p'

printf '\n--- rag-eval-cases red_result_action block ---\n'
sed -n '160,210p' src/lib/rag-eval-cases.ts

Repository: BigSimmo/Database

Length of output: 22376

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail

# Look for test expectations or fixtures that specifically rely on "hold" or "held"
rg -n -C 2 '\bhold\b|\bheld\b' tests src/lib | sed -n '1,240p'

printf '\n--- hasWithholdActionEvidence call sites ---\n'
rg -n -C 2 'hasWithholdActionEvidence|asksForWithholdAction|red_result_action' src/lib/rag-extractive-answer.ts src/lib/rag-eval-cases.ts tests | sed -n '1,220p'

Repository: BigSimmo/Database

Length of output: 17761

---

Use the origin/main regex here. red|amber alone is too permissive, and hold|held matches the surrounding red-result gating patterns.

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 323-323: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD'.

(parse)

---

[error] 326-326: Expected an expression for the left hand side of the === operator.

(parse)

---

[error] 326-326: Expected an expression but instead found '==='.

(parse)

---

[error] 326-326: Expected an expression but instead found '='.

(parse)

---

[error] 326-326: Invalid assignment to ======

(parse)

---

[error] 330-330: Expected an expression for the left hand side of the >>> operator.

(parse)

---

[error] 330-330: Expected an expression but instead found '>>>'.

(parse)

---

[error] 330-330: Expected an expression but instead found '>'.

(parse)

---

[error] 331-331: expected , but instead found text

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@src/lib/rag-extractive-answer.ts` around lines 323 - 333, Update
hasWithholdActionEvidence to match the origin/main regex in
rag-extractive-answer.ts by removing the overly permissive red|amber and
hold|held tokens from the pattern. Keep the existing function name and
surrounding logic unchanged, and use the narrower evidence terms already present
in the origin/main version so the withhold-action detection stays aligned with
the intended gating behavior.

src/lib/rag-routing.ts (2)

40-45: 🩺 Stability & Availability | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Unresolved merge conflict markers — file will not compile.

This file still contains raw Git conflict markers (<<<<<<< HEAD, =======, >>>>>>> origin/main) at multiple locations: Lines 40-45, 260-263, 271-274, 285-288, 302-305, 313-316, 322-325, 351-354, 363/393/439, 452-455, 469-472, and 728-737. Biome confirms these break parsing. Resolving these conflicts is the stated purpose of this PR, so the merge is not actually complete.

Most of these hunks differ only in the presence of JSDoc comments (e.g. Lines 40-45 are the same regex on one vs. two lines), so keeping the origin/main side is safe there. Lines 728-737 and 363-439 require a deliberate choice (see separate note). Please remove all markers and pick the intended side for each.

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 40-40: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD'.

(parse)

---

[error] 43-43: Expected a statement but instead found '======='.

(parse)

---

[error] 45-45: Expected a statement but instead found '>>>>>>> origin/main'.

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@src/lib/rag-routing.ts` around lines 40 - 45, Resolve the remaining merge
conflicts in rag-routing by removing all Git conflict markers and ensuring the
file parses cleanly; the affected areas include the
clozapineBloodWithholdThresholdPattern declaration and the other conflicted
blocks throughout the module. For hunks where only formatting or JSDoc differs,
keep the intended origin/main version and delete the markers; for the larger
decision points near the later disputed sections, choose the correct
implementation consistently within the surrounding symbols and remove all
leftover conflict text.

Source: Learnings

---

728-737: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Keep the origin/main side here (the !actionableConflictOrGap gate).

Beyond marker removal, this hunk is a semantic decision. The origin/main branch additionally gates the table_threshold extractive path on !actionableConflictOrGap, which the routing tests rely on (extractive only when no actionable conflict/gap is present; otherwise fall through to the strong route at Lines 798-818). Dropping the HEAD side keeps routing consistent with those expectations.

Proposed resolution

-<<<<<<< HEAD
-    if (queryClass === "table_threshold" && directTitleSupport && strongestScore >= strongRetrievalThreshold) {
-=======
     if (
       queryClass === "table_threshold" &&
       directTitleSupport &&
       strongestScore >= strongRetrievalThreshold &&
       !actionableConflictOrGap
     ) {
->>>>>>> origin/main

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

    if (
      queryClass === "table_threshold" &&
      directTitleSupport &&
      strongestScore >= strongRetrievalThreshold &&
      !actionableConflictOrGap
    ) {

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 728-728: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD'.

(parse)

---

[error] 730-730: Expected a statement but instead found '======='.

(parse)

---

[error] 737-737: Expected a statement but instead found '>>>>>>> origin/main'.

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@src/lib/rag-routing.ts` around lines 728 - 737, Keep the origin/main
condition in the routing branch by preserving the !actionableConflictOrGap gate
in the table_threshold check inside rag-routing’s decision logic; remove the
merge-conflict markers and ensure the if statement in the relevant routing path
only takes the extractive route when directTitleSupport, strongestScore >=
strongRetrievalThreshold, and no actionable conflict/gap is present, so the
fallback strong route remains reachable.

src/lib/rag.ts (1)

2734-2737: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Unresolved merge conflict markers left in rag.ts — file will not compile.

Literal <<<<<<< HEAD / ======= / >>>>>>> origin/main markers remain at Lines 2734-2737, 2743-2746, 2762-2765, 4690-4693, and 4713-4716 (all doc-comment insertions around hasAdmissionCommunityLookupIntent, shouldReturnBeforeMemory, shouldRecoverFastFailureExtractively, and summarizeGenerationFailureReason). Biome confirms parse errors at every one of these ranges. Since this is a core module (answerQuestionWithScope, routing/scoring helpers live here), this breaks the entire build, not just this file.

Remove the markers and keep the added doc comments (both sides are additive comments only, no logic differs) before merge.

Also applies to: 2743-2746, 2762-2765, 4690-4693, 4713-4716

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 2734-2737: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD

/** Has admission community lookup intent. */

origin/main'.

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@src/lib/rag.ts` around lines 2734 - 2737, Resolve the unresolved merge
conflict markers in rag.ts by removing all `<<<<<<< HEAD`, `=======`, and
`>>>>>>> origin/main` blocks around the doc-comment additions, and keep the
intended comments on the affected helpers. Make sure the merged output is clean
in the sections for `hasAdmissionCommunityLookupIntent`,
`shouldReturnBeforeMemory`, `shouldRecoverFastFailureExtractively`, and
`summarizeGenerationFailureReason`, since these parse errors in
`answerQuestionWithScope` and related routing/scoring code prevent the module
from compiling.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

src/lib/registry-corpus.ts (1)

52-55: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Unresolved merge conflict markers left in registry-corpus.ts — file will not compile.

Literal <<<<<<< HEAD / ======= / >>>>>>> origin/main markers remain throughout this file at Lines 52-55, 315-328, 336-360, 400-403, 408-411, 427-430, 449-452, 468-471, 495-498, and 514-524. Biome reports parse errors at essentially every one of these locations. This file implements registry corpus embedding used by production embed/re-embed flows, so a broken build here is severe.

Also applies to: 315-328, 336-360, 400-403, 408-411, 427-430, 449-452, 468-471, 495-498, 514-524

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 52-55: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD

/** Sha256. */

origin/main'.

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@src/lib/registry-corpus.ts` around lines 52 - 55, Remove all unresolved merge
conflict markers from registry-corpus.ts and keep only the intended
code/documentation in each conflicted block. Check the affected areas around the
registry corpus embedding logic, including the symbols and sections in this file
where the conflict markers appear, and resolve every remaining <<<<<<<, =======,
and >>>>>>> sequence so the file parses and builds cleanly.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

supabase/drift-manifest.json (1)

2-14: 🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Unresolved merge conflict makes the manifest invalid JSON.

The conflict markers break JSON.parse, so every consumer (scripts/check-drift.ts, tests/drift-detection.test.ts) will throw before any comparison runs. Both sides share the same schema_sha256, so only generated_at/replay_seconds differ and the freshness test passes either way — pick one side (the newer origin/main metadata) and delete the markers.

🐛 Proposed resolution

-<<<<<<< HEAD
-  "generated_at": "2026-07-09T10:38:15.859Z",
-  "generator": "scripts/generate-drift-manifest.ts",
-  "postgres_image": "supabase/postgres:17.6.1.127",
-  "schema_sha256": "3a60bf1561142aed58e45a1cf8a9605ccc715dd7358e154c4ad9879b82be4cd5",
-  "replay_seconds": 20,
-=======
   "generated_at": "2026-07-09T11:02:02.346Z",
   "generator": "scripts/generate-drift-manifest.ts",
   "postgres_image": "supabase/postgres:17.6.1.127",
   "schema_sha256": "3a60bf1561142aed58e45a1cf8a9605ccc715dd7358e154c4ad9879b82be4cd5",
   "replay_seconds": 28,
->>>>>>> origin/main

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

  "generated_at": "2026-07-09T11:02:02.346Z",
  "generator": "scripts/generate-drift-manifest.ts",
  "postgres_image": "supabase/postgres:17.6.1.127",
  "schema_sha256": "3a60bf1561142aed58e45a1cf8a9605ccc715dd7358e154c4ad9879b82be4cd5",
  "replay_seconds": 28,

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 2-2: unexpected character <

(parse)

---

[error] 2-2: unexpected character <

(parse)

---

[error] 2-2: unexpected character <

(parse)

---

[error] 2-2: unexpected character <

(parse)

---

[error] 2-2: unexpected character <

(parse)

---

[error] 2-2: unexpected character <

(parse)

---

[error] 2-2: unexpected character <

(parse)

---

[error] 2-2: String values must be double quoted.

(parse)

---

[error] 3-3: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 3-3: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 3-3: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 3-3: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 4-4: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 4-4: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 4-4: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 4-4: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 5-5: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 5-5: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 5-5: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 5-5: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 6-6: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 6-6: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 6-6: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 6-6: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 7-7: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 7-7: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 7-7: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 7-8: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 8-8: unexpected character =

(parse)

---

[error] 8-8: unexpected character =

(parse)

---

[error] 8-8: unexpected character =

(parse)

---

[error] 8-8: unexpected character =

(parse)

---

[error] 8-8: unexpected character =

(parse)

---

[error] 8-8: unexpected character =

(parse)

---

[error] 8-8: unexpected character =

(parse)

---

[error] 9-9: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 9-9: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 9-9: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 9-9: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 10-10: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 10-10: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 10-10: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 10-10: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 11-11: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 11-11: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 11-11: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 11-11: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 12-12: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 12-12: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 12-12: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 12-12: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 13-13: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 13-13: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 13-13: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 13-14: End of file expected

(parse)

---

[error] 14-14: unexpected character >

(parse)

---

[error] 14-14: unexpected character >

(parse)

---

[error] 14-14: unexpected character >

(parse)

---

[error] 14-14: unexpected character >

(parse)

---

[error] 14-14: unexpected character >

(parse)

---

[error] 14-14: unexpected character >

(parse)

---

[error] 14-14: unexpected character >

(parse)

---

[error] 14-14: unexpected character /

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@supabase/drift-manifest.json` around lines 2 - 14, Resolve the merge conflict
in drift-manifest.json so it remains valid JSON by removing the conflict markers
and keeping one clean set of metadata. Use the newer origin/main values for
generated_at and replay_seconds, and ensure the manifest still matches what
scripts/check-drift.ts and tests/drift-detection.test.ts expect to parse.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

tests/rag-answer-fallback.test.ts (1)

415-421: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Unresolved merge conflict markers left in test file — suite will not run.

Literal <<<<<<< HEAD / ======= / >>>>>>> origin/main markers remain at Lines 415-421 around the routingReason matcher. Biome confirms a parse error here. Both sides assert the same regex, just formatted differently, so resolving is trivial — but the markers must be removed for the test file to parse at all.

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 415-416: Expected a statement but instead found '<<<<<<< HEAD
expect(answer.routingReason).toMatch(/high_confidence_extractive_retrieval|source_backed_(?:extractive|review)_fallback/)'.

(parse)

---

[error] 417-420: Expected a statement but instead found '=======
expect(answer.routingReason).toMatch(
/high_confidence_extractive_retrieval|source_backed_(?:extractive|review)_fallback/,
)'.

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@tests/rag-answer-fallback.test.ts` around lines 415 - 421, Resolve the merge
conflict in the routingReason expectation inside the test by removing the
leftover conflict markers and keeping one valid matcher form; the issue is in
the test around the answer.routingReason assertion, and both branches are
equivalent so just preserve either formatting while deleting the <<<<<<< HEAD,
=======, and >>>>>>> origin/main lines.

Source: Linters/SAST tools

tests/rag-routing.test.ts (1)

186-193: 🎯 Functional Correctness | 🔴 Critical | ⚡ Quick win

Unresolved merge conflict markers left in test file — suite will not run.

Literal <<<<<<< HEAD / ======= / >>>>>>> origin/main markers remain at Lines 186-193 (clozapine FBC content string) and Line 207 (closing marker for the "unrelated stop wording" test). Biome reports parse errors throughout this range. This breaks the entire test suite compilation, including the newly updated extractive-routing expectations described for this cohort.

Also applies to: 200-207

🧰 Tools

🪛 Biome (2.5.1)

[error] 186-186: Expected a property, a shorthand property, a getter, a setter, or a method but instead found '<<'.

(parse)

---

[error] 186-186: Expected an expression but instead found '<<'.

(parse)

---

[error] 186-186: Expected an expression but instead found '<<'.

(parse)

---

[error] 187-187: expected > but instead found content

(parse)

---

[error] 187-187: expected , but instead found :

(parse)

---

[error] 188-188: expected , but instead found ===

(parse)

---

[error] 188-188: Expected an expression but instead found '==='.

(parse)

---

[error] 188-188: Expected an expression but instead found '='.

(parse)

---

[error] 188-188: Invalid assignment to ======

(parse)

---

[error] 189-189: expected , but instead found :

(parse)

---

[error] 190-190: expected , but instead found "FBC monitoring is weekly for the first 18 weeks and then every 4 weeks if blood results are in range."

(parse)

---

[error] 191-191: expected , but instead found :

(parse)

---

[error] 192-192: expected , but instead found }

(parse)

---

[error] 192-192: expected , but instead found )

(parse)

---

[error] 193-193: Expected an identifier, an array pattern, or an object pattern but instead found ']'.

(parse)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@tests/rag-routing.test.ts` around lines 186 - 193, Resolve the merge conflict
artifacts in the rag-routing test cases by removing all conflict markers and
keeping the intended final assertions for the clozapine FBC content and the
unrelated stop wording block. Update the affected test setup where the
array/object for these expectations is defined so the preserved content and
text_rank values are valid TypeScript. Ensure no `<<<<<<<`, `=======`, or
`>>>>>>>` markers remain anywhere in the test file so Biome can parse and run
the suite.

Source: Linters/SAST tools